Consistent assessment criteria
Every candidate is assessed on the same dimensions, so requests from different sites and business units can be compared.
Capex Platform · Capex Planning
Decide what to fund. Bring requests from every site into one capex plan. Assess them on the same criteria, test them against the funding envelope and take the plan to approval.

1
Intake for every capital candidate
Same
Criteria applied to every request
Live
Envelope testing without annual rebuilds
One
Decision that sets the year's priorities
What it does
A capex plan is only as strong as the reasoning behind each choice in it.
Every candidate is assessed on the same dimensions, so requests from different sites and business units can be compared.
Each investment carries the objective it serves, making it clear which parts of the strategy the plan actually funds.
Compliance, safety and discretionary investments are kept apart, so the share of the envelope that mandatory investments take is visible before any strategic choice is made.
Move the funding level and see what fits within it and what has to wait.
Deferring an investment has a consequence. Weissr records it with the request, so the cost is part of the decision instead of an argument afterwards.
When conditions change, update the plan in the existing model instead of rebuilding a spreadsheet.
How a capex plan comes together
All capital candidates from every site, function and business unit enter through one structured intake. Because the fields are common, a request from one site can be compared with a request from another without translation or interpretation.
Each candidate is classified by what drives it. This single step reveals how much of the envelope is already committed before any strategic choice is made.
Candidates are assessed on the strategic objective they serve, the risk of not doing them, their cost profile, their dependency on other investments and their expected return. Everyone sees the same criteria, so an assessment can be examined instead of merely disputed.
The plan shows what fits within the available funding and what does not. Moving the funding level shows which investments have to wait and which objectives become unfunded as a result.
Each investment carries its planned timing, so the plan shows what is funded and when. The people who know the sites decide what is realistic to deliver in each period.
The plan goes to the body that owns the decision. Once approved, it sets the priorities for the year, so approvals move faster and land where the capital was meant to go.
What changes
Guide
How strategy, planning, budgeting and execution connect.
Related
Track the projects the plan commits you to.
Module
Convert the agreed plan into a governed budget.
Module
Set the long-term direction the plan has to deliver.
Module
Govern approvals, spend and delivery once the plan is funded.
Capex planning
Capex planning software turns competing investment requests into one agreed capex plan. Every candidate is evaluated on the same criteria, which gives one comparable view across sites and business units. Trade-offs against available funding are visible before capital is committed, so the plan can be defended instead of being decided by submission order.
In Weissr, capex planning is a capability of Weissr Capex Management, not a separate product. The platform has three modules: Capex Strategy, Capital Budgeting and Capex Management. Planning runs inside the third, alongside approvals and execution tracking, so the plan the organisation agrees on is the same record the projects are approved and followed up on.
The plan goes to the body that owns the decision. Once approved, it sets the priorities for the year. Individual approvals then move faster, because each project is checked against a plan that has already been agreed.
A capex plan is the agreed set of capital investments an organisation intends to make over a defined period, with their timing, cost profile and expected benefit. It sits between long-term capital strategy and the approval and execution of individual projects.
Effective prioritisation compares each candidate on the same criteria: the strategic objective it serves, the risk of not doing it, its cost profile, its dependency on other investments and its expected return. In Weissr every request is assessed on those same criteria, so the decisions behind the plan can be explained and defended.
Compliance and safety investments are classified as mandatory, so the share of the envelope they take is visible before any strategic choice is made. They are flagged, not reserved from the envelope, because a mandatory investment can still be postponed to next year and left out of this year's budget. A site's long-term role also matters. If its future is under review, even mandatory investments there may be questioned.
See how your current candidate list would look scored on consistent criteria.
Book a demo